Insights
Understand recent decisions, common legal problems, and the practical steps that may matter for your situation.
Research · Review · ExplainShowing 1–12 of 75 insights
Discovering incorrect employment history, documents or other information in an immigration application raises two separate problems: the immigration consequences and a possible claim against the representative.
Stewart v Richardson, 2026 BCCA 362, explains why unresolved financial issues did not prevent a parenting decision in that case—and why the answer still depends on the child, the issues and the evidence.
Pearce v. Napier, 2026 BCSC 1694, shows both the consequences of repeated disclosure failures and why contempt is not the automatic next step in a BC family case.
Our partner Nyusha Samiei discusses why French-language resources can make a meaningful difference for parents navigating separation in British Columbia.
Family help with a home purchase can create difficult questions after separation. The original intention, the paper trail and the difference between family debt and a parent's own claim are critical.
The new consultant compensation fund offers a possible recovery route for certain losses caused by dishonesty. Its eligibility rules, payment limit and relationship with a BC civil claim matter.
The free online course gives Francophone parents direct access to practical information about separation, co-parenting, conflict reduction and family dispute resolution.
A pleading error concerning the ownership of mining claims affected a major settlement. The BC Supreme Court found negligence and causation, but substantially reduced the damages for the outcome that would otherwise have occurred and for the clients' contributory negligence.
A 2026 BC Supreme Court decision reviews the requirements for recognizing a foreign judgment and the narrow defences that may prevent enforcement.
The BC Supreme Court examined an exclusive relationship of about 18 years and concluded that the parties were not spouses under the Family Law Act.
A 2026 BC Supreme Court decision shows why relocation cases remain individualized, how non-physical family violence can affect the analysis, and why an expert's recommendation does not decide the case.
The BC Court of Appeal in Leger v. Williams, 2026 BCCA 300 set aside a Return Order and reaffirmed that s. 46 relocation cases require a forward-looking best interests analysis, not a judgment on the moving parent's reasons.
Publication standard
Explore case summaries and practical guides, then follow the source links where provided. For advice about how the law applies to your circumstances, speak with a lawyer.
Read the editorial standardSinclair Centre Law
Tell us the general nature of your matter and any immediate deadline. Please do not send confidential documents until the firm confirms it can act.
